//
you're reading...

Church Communications

John Piper’s Concern About Media In The Church

John Piper’s article on whether churches should use video and drama during worship stirred up a small controversy.

theater

It was argued by some that he was anti-media. We’ll examine it.

I know one thing can be understood in 10 different ways. But some controversies grow out of misinterpretation.

That problem can occur when more is read into what a person is saying than what he originally intended. Comment threads on blogs questioning Piper’s position about media are an example.

About 6-8 comments down on some of these blogs, I found myself wondering how a man of John Piper’s education and intellect could say such ridiculous things being attributed to him.

I had to go back and re-read what he actually wrote.

In my view, he hadn’t conveyed anything close to the ideas some of his detractors were presenting as his. So, to nip that in the bud for our discussion, let’s examine what John Piper “said” and “didn’t say” in his article.

In his own words

He didn’t say using media was in violation of Scripture. He said “the Bible doesn’t forbid it.”

He didn’t say everyone should stop using media. He said, “You can do whatever you want to do.”

He didn’t say all use of media was to compensate for weak preaching. He said it’s “largely a token of unbelief in the power of preaching.” (I might question his research on this point. But, suffice it to say, if you’re church doesn’t have weak preaching, the point doesn’t apply.)

He didn’t say the church shouldn’t use drama at all. He said “I went to a drama at our church four days ago. I believe in drama.”

He didn’t say the arts have no place in the church. He said, “Let’s have the arts in our churches, but don’t try to squash it all into Sunday morning.”

In John Piper’s own words, as I understood them, he is not against the use of media by the church. Or for that matter, by his global media ministry, Desiring God.

The main concern

While not anti-media, Piper did express some reservations about the use of media during worship. His main concern seems to be that “We’ll just go further and further.”  Piper didn’t write a thesis on the subject, thus no detailed explanation is given about what he meant by “further.” The reader is left to imagine. The picture in this post was chosen to help with that.

Perhaps Piper meant that by adding elements to purely entertain, media could overpower personal worship and praise; become its focus. If you’ve ever experienced the visceral impact of a rock concert or the dramatic intensity of a Broadway production, I think you get the idea.

It seems to me that “going further with media” might also mean anything during a service that distracts people from meeting with God. Would Twittering in church be a distraction? Piper says “yes” in this post. For the record, he’s not anti-twittering.

For Bethlehem Baptist Church, Piper has decided that video clips and drama could be a distraction. So, they don’t do it. However, and this is important … he doesn’t pronounce judgment on anyone else for using visual media or technology. Nor does he advocate any new rules calling for its prohibition.

The bottom line

As I see it, the bottom line to Piper’s position is this: when it comes to the use of media and technology during worship, “freedom.” Freedom with responsibility to be mindful of the power of media. I hear the pastor saying, “Watch out. Be on guard. Don’t go too far.” That’s what pastors are supposed to do.

On matters such as this, the pastors at our church say, “Methods are many principles few, methods may change, principles never do.”

Worship him who made the heavens, the earth, the sea and the springs of water. Revelation 14:7

I believe God has given us the tools of media and technology. We should use them wisely during worship and for ministry outside the four walls of the church. To use them or not to use them is a matter of discernment, thorough evaluation and congregational choice.

The Bible should always be our guide. We never want to cross the line into worshipping and serving created things rather than the Creator – who is forever praised.

Question: If your pastor decided to stop using video and drama during worship, would you change churches? Would you support twittering during worship?

  • http://www.stickyJesus.com toni birdsong

    I'm with you. I see it as commentary and not a declaration of division or "old school" thinking. If we can't let a man of the cloth like John Piper speak wisdom into our lives without jumping on it and analyzing it to death then we need to check our own hearts. Maybe, just maybe there's godly wisdom. But, so many are quick to judge, we are the ones that forgo the benefit. We are always to be on guard—it's the subtle things that lead us eventually into sin. Thank you Mr. Piper for reminding us to stay awake and vigilant at all times.

    To your question: NO I'd never change churches based on video use. My pastor is a man of God and anointed by the Holy Spirit. The only time I'd change churches is if my pastor quit using the Holy Spirit! (If you ever want some laser-focused, bold, anointed WORD spoken into your life go here and listen to Steve Berger http://www.gracechapel.net. Thanks for the great post, Gordon!

    • http://www.gordonmarcy.com GordonMarcy

      Completely agree on the leaving church point. Our church is at the apex of the curve when it comes to communication technologies. But we could shut that down tomorrow and the power of the Spirit and force of biblical teaching would be intact. Those were the compelling factors that led us to attend and keeps us in place. Not the widgets.

  • http://www.stickyJesus.com toni birdsong

    I'm not a fan of Twittering during church services. I think God wants my full attention. I'd hate to MISS the holy spirit speaking to me because I was busy tweeting. If there are points of inspiration I think will help "the world" outside of the church service that day, then I take notes and share them on FB or Twitter when I get home. Personally, I don't want people to see me Twittering during service. It might distract their worship and it looks disrespectful to both the pastor and the Lord. It's also nothing I'd want to model for my kids.

    Where will this go next (nod to Piper)? Will we start streaming personal video of ourselves and our commentary during services? It really is about reverence and holiness. When technology begins to interfere with that personal, sacred pursuit, I'm out.

    • http://www.gordonmarcy.com GordonMarcy

      To be honest, I've used twitter and even live blogged, http://bit.ly/ebEVA5, during several of our church services. However, I did it as an experiment from the church cafe, where we can watch the services on TV monitors. We even serve communion there.

      Honestly, the setting lent itself to "live" sharing with others, but my worship experience was very different. More work like. A loss of intimacy. I would not do it regularly and would never tweet or blog from the main auditorium.

      Unless one day the pastor said, "OK, today is 'Power Up' day. We're going to transmit the power of the gospel up to your digital networks all over the world. You have permission to use all digital devices and platforms during the service. Just be sure to give an invitation to meet Christ at the end." Wonder what the one day and residual reach for the gospel would be with 20,000 mini-networks all powered up at the same time with the same message? Crazy huh?

Random Quote

Two of the most effective evangelistic outreaches were the annual Easter pageant that drew over 70,000 people each spring, and the radio ministry on WFIA and WHAS. Radio proved to be a very effective outreach for us. — Bob Russell, former senior pastor of Southeast Christian, Louisville, KY

YouVersion